USPTO serial 75586217
SANDY BEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANDY BEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin A. Levitin
MARTIN A LEVITIN NOTARO & MICHALOS PC100 DUTCH HILL RD STE 110ORANGEBURG, NY 10962-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fabric bed and table covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Ready-to-wear ladies', men's and children's clothing, namely, coats, jackets, vests, blouses, shirts, sweaters, pants, skirts, dresses, hats, tunics, loungewear, intimate apparel, namely, undergarments and sleepwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets, rugs, mats, namely, mats made of jute, coir and wool and matting, namely, matting made of jute, wool, coir and canvas | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, stuffed toys, carved wooden toys, and mechanical toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Starkman, Sanford J.
- Other trademarks owned by Starkman, Sanford J.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SANDY BEAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |