Drawing for MPS FLORICULTURE ENVIRONMENT PROJECT

USPTO serial 75586561

MPS FLORICULTURE ENVIRONMENT PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MPS FLORICULTURE ENVIRONMENT PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DEBORAH A PEACOCK

DEBORAH A PEACOCK PEACOCK MYERS & ADAMS PCP O BOX 26927ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87125-6927UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Goods made from paper, cardboard, plastic and goods made from those materials, namely, stationery, newsprint, paper bags for packaging, paper envelopes for packaging, paper pouches for packaging, wrapping paper, printed matter, namely, leaflets, brochures, and newsletters regarding environmental qualifications, plastic bubble packs for wrapping and packaging, plastic bags, envelopes and pouches for merchandise packaging, paper bags, envelopes, and pouches for merchandise packaging, and plastic film for wrapping and packaging, especially for agricultural, horticultural and floricultural productsACTIVE—
031agricultural unprocessed grains and seeds for animal feed stocks and sowing and planting flora, grasses, trees, and shrubs; and natural living plants and flowersACTIVE—
042agricultural services, namely, advising others in the field of plant and flower breeding, bulbs parental materials and nursery productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 2, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 2, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 1, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance