Drawing for HIGHER/HIREMINDS

USPTO serial 75586572

HIGHER/HIREMINDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHER/HIREMINDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl Oppedahl

CARL OPPEDAHL OPPEDAHL & LARSON LLPP O BOX 5270FRISCO, CO 80443-5270UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035dissemination of advertising for media professionals via an on-line electronic communications networkACTIVEJul 16, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance