USPTO serial 75586777
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A SOKOLSKI
ROBERT F HELFING SEDGWICK DETERT MORAN & ARNOLD LLP801 S FIGUEROA 19TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AUTOMOBILES | ABANDONED | Apr 6, 1965 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |