USPTO serial 75586933
OPTONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas P. Storer
THOMAS P STORER GOODWIN PROCTER LLPEXCHANGE PL53 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Capital equipment for the semiconductor manufacturing industry, namely, inspection and test apparatus for measuring the performance characteristics of semiconductors | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of capital equipment for semiconductor manufacturing, namely, inspection and test systems for semiconductor manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, and evaluation for the purpose of certification of capital equipment for semiconductor manufacturing for others, namely, inspection and test systems for semiconductor manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |