USPTO serial 75587055
MONOBLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONOBLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Deer Park, NY
Deer Park, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA PICKERING
TERRENCE J MCALLISTER OHLANDT GREELEY RUGGIERO & PERLEONE LANDMARK SQ 10TH FLSTAMFORD, CT 06901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Components for x-ray imaging systems, namely, an assembly integrating an x-ray tube and a power supply, for medical use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dynarad Corporation, a DEL Global Technologies company and a member of the DEL Global Power Conversion Group
- Other trademarks owned by Dynarad Corporation, a DEL Global Technologies company and a member of the DEL Global Power Conversion Group
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MONOBLOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |