USPTO serial 75587155
BIXEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIXEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARL A. KUKKONEN
CARL A KUKKONEN VIALOGY CORP2400 LINCOLN AVEALTADENA, CA 91001-5436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING GENETIC MATERIALS SAMPLES, BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS SAMPLES AND CHEMICALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | CHEMICAL AND OPTOELECTRONIC BIOSENSORS, BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS SENSORS, GENETIC MATERIALS SENSORS, CHEMICAL MATERIALS SENSORS, GENETIC SENSORY IMPLANTS; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS AND CHEMICAL LABORATORY EQUIPMENT NAMELY, DNA BIOCHIP ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT, FOR ANALYZING GENETIC MATERIALS; THERAPY EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING DEVICES, NAMELY, BIOCHIP SENSORS AND COMPUTERS, ALL FOR MEDICAL OR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ViaSpace Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ViaSpace Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BIXEL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |