USPTO serial 75587190
DOUGHNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOUGHNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H Peck
ANNE H PECK COOLEY GODWARD LLP5 PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELDS OF ECOMMERCE, SHOPPING, BANKING, INVESTING AND CHARITABLE GIVING | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 036 | PROVIDING ON-LINE BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY FACILITATION OF FUNDS TRANSFERS FOR RETAIL AND INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS AND CHARITABLE DONATIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 1999 |
| 042 | EDUCATIONAL ON-LINE SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, NAMELY PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL TUTORIALS IN THE AREAS OF FINANCES, SHOPPING, BANKING, INVESTING, CHARITABLE GIVING, AND COMMUNITY ACTION OPPORTUNITIES FOR TEENS AND THEIR FAMILIES | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |