USPTO serial 75587739
THINSULITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINSULITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Morgan Crucible Company plc, The
SL4 1EP Windsor, Berkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H Brewster
WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | heat insulating materials in the form of fibres, blankets, modules, panels, bats, gaskets, yarns, ropes, cloth, paper, felt, strips, logs, mesh-enclosed rounds, sheets, blocks, curtains, tapes, tubes, cord, mastic and moulded insulation shapes, boards and composite form; insulation fibres in blanket form laminated on one or both sides with aluminium foil; all for use as fire protection barrier materials, for use in furnaces, boilers, kilns and the like hightemperature utilizing apparatus or for use in iron and steel, non-ferrous metals, petrochemical, ceramics and cement processes and for use in domestic appliances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |