USPTO serial 75587915
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ROSEVILLE, CA
Grass Valley, CA
Grass Valley, CA
Grass Valley, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori N. Boatright
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1026UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software, with accompanying user manuals, for recording the input from scientific and measurement devices, and for collection, processing, analysis, annotation, and presentation of the input data on handheld computers; prerecorded audio and video cassette tapes featuring educational information explaining the use of the same computer hardware and software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 20, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |