USPTO serial 75588047
SUGAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUGAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold D.Steinberg
HAROLD D STEINBERG STEINBERG & RASKIN, PC1140 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CREAMS, LOTIONS, MILKS AND GELS FOR THE CARE OF THE FACE AND BODY, PERFUMED CREAMS, LOTIONS, MILKS AND GELS FOR CARE OF THE BODY, PERFUME, EAU DE TOILETTE, EAU DE PARFUM, EAU DE COLOGNE, PERFUMED TALCUM POWDER, BATH FOAMS, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR USE AS INGREDIENTS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF COSMETIC PREPARATIONS, SHAVING FOAMS, AFTER SHAVES LOTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |