Drawing for CROWN LEGAL STAFFING

USPTO serial 75588248

CROWN LEGAL STAFFING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROWN LEGAL STAFFING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary L. Eastman

GARY L EASTMAN PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP530 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4469UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035legal placement servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 28, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance