Drawing for INSTANT!PLACE

USPTO serial 75588341

INSTANT!PLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSTANT!PLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B HARRISON

MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES, SENDING AND RECEIVING ELECTRONIC MAIL, NETWORK CONFERENCING, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, DATA PROCESSING, DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT AND ARCHIVING, AND TELEFAX CAPABILITIES ALL FOR USE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR A LOCAL NETWORK AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITACTIVE—
042CREATING AND MAINTAINING A WEB SITE FOR OTHERS; LEASING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES, AND FOR USE IN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS APPLICATIONS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR LOCAL AREA NETWORK; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES, SENDING AND RECEIVING ELECTRONIC MAIL, NETWORK CONFERENCING, FOR USE IN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, DATA PROCESSING, DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT AND ARCHIVING, AND TELEFAX CAPABILITIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance