USPTO serial 75588607
STERLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STERLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judy Kruger
JUDY KRUGER BRACEWELL & PATTERSON, LLPS TWR PENNZOIL PL711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2781Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Medical diagnostic imaging film and equipment, namely, unexposed x-ray film and x-ray film development chemicals | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Printed film, namely transparent film for printing digital images | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical diagnostic imaging and processing equipment, namely x-ray screens and cassettes, image capture arrays, imaging heads, image receivers, computer hardware for use in image generating, image processing, image archiving and communicating image signals, image display screens and monitors, and image printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Medical diagnostic imaging services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |