USPTO serial 75588925
MICRONOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2810851Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICRONOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer consultation for software application development; computer software design for others; computer services, namely designing and implementing websites for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |