USPTO serial 75589176
CORDENA CALL MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWEENEY, MEGAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORDENA CALL MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PC1 SCARBOROUGH STATION PLZSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DIRECT AND INDIRECT BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER, COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, NAMELY, SECRETARIAL AND CLERICAL SERVICES, TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF TELEBUSINESS BY PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS AND DISTRIBUTING PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS, BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONS AND POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS, MARKET ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH, PROVIDING STATISTICAL INFORMATION FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |