USPTO serial 75589448
TEE-MAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029538Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEE-MAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fairfax, VA, US
Fairfax, VA, US
Fairfax, VA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE AND RETAIL DISTRIBUTORSHIP FEATURING GOLF EQUIPMENT, GOLF AND SPORT CLOTHES; GOLF BOOKS, AUDIO CASSETTES, VIDEO CASSETTES, COMPACT DISKS AND CD-ROMS WHICH MAY BE ACCESSED BY WAY OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2025 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 17, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |