Drawing for PROFECTION BEST PRACTICES IN CATEGORY MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75589546

PROFECTION BEST PRACTICES IN CATEGORY MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROFECTION BEST PRACTICES IN CATEGORY MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie K. Mitchell

LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business marketing consulting services, namely, assisting retail stores in designing sales programs for confectionery productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 27, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 27, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 6, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 8, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance