Drawing for BOO-TIQUE

USPTO serial 75589841

BOO-TIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOO-TIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren A. Sklar

WARREN A SKLAR RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR1621 EUCLID AVENINETEENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003makeupACTIVE—
011lawn lightsACTIVE—
016paper and cardboard party and yard decorations, plastic lawn bags, confetti, pencils, and stickersACTIVE—
020ornaments made of resin or plastic for indoor and outdoor decoration, not including Christmas tree ornamentsACTIVE—
021wicker baskets, candle holders not of precious metal, and bowlsACTIVE—
025Halloween costumes and hatsACTIVE—
026artificial garlands and wigsACTIVE—
028party favors in the nature of small toys and hand puppets; pinatas; wind socks for decorative purposes; and costume masksACTIVEOct 20, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance