USPTO serial 75589842
Serial No. 75589842
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75589842?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT B. MARKOW
SCOTT B MARKOW THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATIONTW199701 E JOPPA RDTOWSON, MD 21286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric power tools having an electric motor or other electric driving system, or powered by electric energy, namely pneumatic and electric nailers | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |