USPTO serial 75589963
PRO-X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2588821Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2002
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO-X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CINCINNATI, OH
Holmdel, NJ
Holmdel, NJ
Holmdel, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EMILY M. JUDGE
EMILY M. JUDGE THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY299 E. SIXTH STREETS8-226CINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic products, namely, [ color cosmetics, namely, lipsticks, foundations, blushes, eye shadows, eyeliners, lipstick liners, mascara; ] skin treatment products, namely, [ cleansers, toners, ] moisturizers [ , eye creams, hand and body lotions and body and facial soap; and fragrance products, namely, cologne, perfume splashing water, scented soaps, body powders, bath oils; and sun screen preparations said goods being sold primarily to department and specialty stores ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by AdeM Cosmetic Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AdeM Cosmetic Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AdeM Cosmetic Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PRO-X
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |