Drawing for VIRTUAL BUSINESS MACHINE

USPTO serial 75590022

VIRTUAL BUSINESS MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BILLINGS, JESSIE W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL BUSINESS MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES L. WARNER, II

CHARLES L WARNER II TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, and computer related apparatus, namely, universal telephony platforms, call centers, servers, automatic telephone dialers, computers, computer terminals, workstations comprising a computer terminal with voice communications, data processors, voice processors, interactive controllers, voice controllers, data controllers, data routers, data switches, voice routers, voice switches, private branch exchanges, and automatic call distributors, all for enabling, managing, storing, organizing, directing, networking, and controlling information such as voice, video, data, facsimile, e-mail, mixed media, multiple media multi-media, information such as voice, video, data, facsimile, e-mail mixed media, multiple media, multi-media, communications, and databases; for exchanging information and tasks via local, national and global information networks; for maintaining security of and controlling access to information networks; for browsing and searching for information and tasks among communications networks and databases; for enabling multi-user access to local, national and global information networks; and for providing graphical user interfaces for transmission of information and tasksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance