USPTO serial 75590351
BENEFITS CHOLESTEROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENEFITS CHOLESTEROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
21200 Raisio, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon Michaelson
JON MICHAELSON COUDERT BROTHERS LLP530 LYTTON AVE STE 300PALO ALTO, CA 94301-1541UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietetic foods adapted for medical use for consumption by humans and baby food | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | foods, namely meat, fish, poultry and game foods; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces; eggs, milk and milk dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, instant coffee, flour and processed cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, namely candy, flavored ices, ice cream, ice milk, frozen yogurt; honey, treacle; yeast, baking- powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, salad dressings and sauces; spices, ice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |