USPTO serial 75590622
CGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BETH M. KOTRAN
BETH M KOTRAN GOODWIN, PROCTER & HOAR LLP7 BECKER FARM RDROSELAND, NJ 07068-1737UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER NETWORKS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 038 | CALL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, CALL SCREENING, MULTIPLE LOCATION SEARCH CAPABILITIES AND CALL-ROUTING, UNIFIED MESSAGING, AND MANAGED FAX TRANSMISSION | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 039 | DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC STORAGE FOR OTHERS OF CORPORATE RECORDS,INVOICES, CONTRACTS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | TECHNICAL END USER COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE NATURE OF HELP DESK SUPPORT SERVICES IN THERE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMATION REGARDING MANAGING COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, APPLICATIONS DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, AND CALL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND HELP DESK SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Computer Generated Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |