USPTO serial 75590627
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Omaha, NE
Omaha, NE
Omaha, NE
OMAHA, NE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Bikus
Christopher M. Bikus Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP1620 Dodge StreetSuite 2100Omaha, NE 68102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen prepared dinners and entrees consisting primarily of beef, poultry, pork | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |