USPTO serial 75590680
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Consumer Credit Associates, Inc.
Houston, TX
Consumer Credit Associates, Inc.
Houston, TX
COLUMBUS, OH
COLUMBUS, OH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CORY M. AMRON
CORY M AMRON VORYS SATER SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP1828 L ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer database management software regarding consumer payment practices, namely, credit reporting, list fulfillment, collection reporting, account scoring and prediction, and fraud detection services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |