USPTO serial 75590799
PIXO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIXO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eliane Setton
ELAINE SETTON GRAY CARY WARE & FRIEDENRICH LLP153 TOWNSEND ST STE 800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107-1957UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERSONAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING, MANAGING, VIEWING, AND EDITING ELECTRONIC MAIL, FACSIMILES, VOICE MESSAGES, TASK LISTS, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE LISTS, AND NOTES AND MEMORANDA, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; SOFTWARE FOR CREATING, EDITING, AND MANAGING AND ELECTRONIC ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE BOOK, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; TELEPHONE DIALING SOFTWARE, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; CALCULATOR SOFTWARE, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; GRAPHICAL WORLD CLOCK SOFTWARE, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; CALENDAR SOFTWARE, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; SMS (SHORT-MESSAGING) SOFTWARE, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; COMPUTER GAMES SOFTWARE, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; SOFTWARE FOR DISPLAYING INFORMATION IN FOREIGN LANGUAGES, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; SOFTWARE FOR ACCESSING, SELECTING, PARSING AND REFORMATTING TEXT AND IMAGES FOR DISPLAY ON WIRELESS TELEPHONES; SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES WHICH ALLOWS USERS TO CONDUCT ELECTRONIC COMMERCE VIA A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK; SOFTWARE, NAMELY, A MICROBROWSER FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES FOR ACCESSING DATA ON A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK; SOFTWARE FOR THE TRANSFER AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF DATA TO AND FROM DATA BASES, TO AND FROM COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER FILES, AND TO AND FROM PRIVATE AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR USE WITH WIRELESS TELEPHONES; AND SOFTWARE, NAMELY, A USER INTERFACE FOR WIRELESS TELEPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |