USPTO serial 75590842
THE RESIDENCY CLUB COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE RESIDENCY CLUB COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | real estate ownership exchange services, namely vacation real estate time-sharing | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |