USPTO serial 75590849
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications equipment, components and test equipment, namely, microwave signal sources, transceivers, frequency converters, digital signal modulators, digital demodulators, burst modems, digital signal processors, computers and computer software for bandwidth management, ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) processing equipment, namely, ATM access switches and ATM edge switches, computers and computer software for network management, TCP/IP packet devices, namely, computers and computer software to encrypt communications traffic, digital protocol converters, digital switches | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |