Drawing for ADAPTIVE BROADBAND

USPTO serial 75590849

ADAPTIVE BROADBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADAPTIVE BROADBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Kelly

DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications equipment, components and test equipment, namely, microwave signal sources, transceivers, frequency converters, digital signal modulators, digital demodulators, burst modems, digital signal processors, computers and computer software for bandwidth management, ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) processing equipment, namely, ATM access switches and ATM edge switches, computers and computer software for network management, TCP/IP packet devices, namely, computers and computer software to encrypt communications traffic, digital protocol converters, digital switchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 10, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 6, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance