Drawing for TACTEL MICRO TOUCH

USPTO serial 75590864

TACTEL MICRO TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TACTEL MICRO TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Gould

DAVID J GOULD E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COWILMINGTON, DE 19898UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025fabric used as an integral component of clothing, footwear and headwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 23, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 22, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 1, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 17, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance