USPTO serial 75590904
STARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A SEBOLT
JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTASTON PARK PROFESSIONAL CTR STE 1944801 DRESSIER RD NWCANTON, OH 44718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine parts, namely, centers for supporting work pieces in a lathe or grinding machine, and metal cutting tools, namely, biax scrapers, boring and facing heads, broaches, counterbores, deburring tools, end mills, grooving tools, hollow mills, keyseat cutters, keyway broaches, knurling tools, concave and convex milling cutters, double angle milling cutters, gear milling cutters, indexable carbide milling cutters, single angle milling cutters, spline milling cutters, staggered tooth milling cutters, straight tooth milling cutters, thread milling cutters, reamers, rotary files, thread chasers, all for stationary and portable machining, milling and broaching tools | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1992 |
| 035 | Distributorship services for resale of metal cutting tools for stationary and portable machining, milling, and broaching tools | ACTIVE | May 19, 1964 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |