Drawing for CITY CHAIN

USPTO serial 75590965

CITY CHAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITY CHAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA220 E 42ND ST 30TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical consultation and research relating to watches and clocksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2003REINREINSTATED
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 27, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 27, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 27, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 12, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 2, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 15, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 28, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 28, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 21, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 5, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance