USPTO serial 75591001
CORRMHIOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORRMHIOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC DATA, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION OF IMAGES, MESSAGES, PICTURES, SOUNDS AND SPEECH | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA VIA SATELLITE TRANSMISSION; COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS TO GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND PICTURES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; DESIGN, UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; LEASING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES TO OBTAIN DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR RETRIEVAL DATA AND INFORMATION; CONSULTATIONS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE; AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telia AB
- Other trademarks owned by Telia AB
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CORRMHIOL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |