USPTO serial 75591452
SUNSURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNSURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Prabha R. Rollins
PRABHA R ROLLINS DOW LOHNES & ALBERTSON1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, providing wireless communications equipment insurance | ABANDONED | Feb 20, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Triton PCS Operating Company L.L.C
- Other trademarks owned by AFFILIATE LICENSE COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AFFILIATE LICENSE COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named SUNSURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |