Drawing for RIDDELL

USPTO serial 75591493

RIDDELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIDDELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARLANA S COHEN

ARLANA S COHEN REENS LLCST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON986 BEDFORD ST STE 1STAMFORD, CT 06905-5619

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Interactive video game programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 3, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 26, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 21, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance