USPTO serial 75591873
ADMIRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 2010
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ADMIRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL BRAND LICENSING AG
7250 KLOSTERS, CH
SURFSIDE, FL
CH-7001 Chur, CH
INTERNATIONAL BRAND LICENSING AG
1003 Lausanne, CH
INTERNATIONAL BRAND LICENSING AG
1003 Lausanne, CH
PUERTO PLATA, DO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Zaccaria
John Zaccaria Notaro, Michalos & Zaccaria P.C.100 Dutch Hill Road, Suite 240Orangeburg, NY 10962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ computer games programs, software, cassettes, video game software and cartridges, not for use in the gaming or gambling industry; protective helmets; ] sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BRAND LICENSING AG
- Other trademarks owned by ADMIRAL SPORTSWEAR LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Admiral Sportswear License AG
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BRAND LICENSING AG
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BRAND LICENSING AG
- Other trademarks owned by ADMIRAL SPORTS SRL
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ADMIRAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |