USPTO serial 75592022
GREENWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREENWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Middleburg, VA
Middleburg, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WENDY L ADDISS
WENDY L ADDISS COUDERT BROS1627 I ST NWD, WA 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters, magazines and books in the field of the environment; bumper stickers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |