USPTO serial 75592061
FIRST CHOICE HEALTH PLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIRST CHOICE HEALTH PLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie du Laney
VALERIE DU LANEY MILLER NASH601 UNION ST 4400 TWO UNION SQSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | underwriting of health insurance services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |