USPTO serial 75592111
CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL R GRAHAM
MICHAEL R GRAHAM MARSHALL O'TOOLE GERSTEIN MURRAY & BORUNSEARS TWR233 S WACKER DR STE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in computer and telephony networking, accessing and navigating global computer network, browsing world wide web site, web site authoring, sending and receiving electronic mail, data, and images, and utilizing global computer network resources and protocols, personal computers, workstations, computer and telephone network routing equipment, computer and telephone network hubs, routers, and bridges, telephones and telephone network equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financing services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 038 | Providing integrated enterprise and networked voice, data, and multi-media telecommunications services, namely providing local and long distance telephone service, telephone and computer installation and repair services, computer and telephone network installation services, paging services, teleconferencing services, voice mail services, messaging services, electronic transmission of data, images, and documents via computer terminals and local area, wide area, and global computer networks, electronic storage and retrieval of data and documents, data telecommunication, web site authoring services, web site hosting services, and electronic mail services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Consultation services in the field of telecommunications, computer, data, telephone, and telecommunications network services, equipment and maintenance; leasing computers, workstations, computer networks, telephones, and telephone networks and leasing access time to local area, wide area, and worldwide network of computer networks, data bases, and computerized sites relating to all types of services, interests, and activities | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |