Drawing for NOTORIOUS

USPTO serial 75592192

NOTORIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOTORIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Ross

Richard Ross Perkins Coie LLPSuite 49001201 Third AvenueSeattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Series of pre-recorded audiovisual tapes, audiovisual discs and CD-ROMs featuring news magazines programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 23, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 15, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 23, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 24, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance