Drawing for IS2 RESEARCH INC.

USPTO serial 75592269

IS2 RESEARCH INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IS2 RESEARCH INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Sommers

MARK S SOMMERS FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOWGARRETT & DUNNER, LLP1300 1 ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, DIGITAL SCINTILLATION CAMERAS; HAND CONTROLLERS FOR OPERATING DIGITAL SCINTILLATION CAMERAS AND DIGITAL SCINTILLATION CAMERA SYSTEMS; DIGITAL SCINTILLATION CAMERA SYSTEMS, NAMELY, DIGITAL SCINTILLATION CAMERA, GANTRY, COLLIMATOR, PATIENT SUPPORT, HAND CONTROLLER AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING OPERATION OF SAID CAMERA SYSTEM; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACQUISITION, DISPLAY, ANALYSIS AND STORAGE OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGES; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS USED IN ASSOCIATION WITH DIGITAL SCINTILLATION CAMERA SYSTEMSACTIVE—
037installation, maintenance, repair and overhaul of digital scintillation cameras and systems; and remote maintenance of digital scintillation cameras and systemsACTIVE—
041training in the operation of digital scintillation cameras and systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance