Drawing for POSITION COST AVERAGING

USPTO serial 75592357

POSITION COST AVERAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POSITION COST AVERAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS C. SAITTA

THOMAS C SAITTA LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C SAITTA6821 SOUTHPOINT DR NSTE 203JACKSONVILLE, FL 32216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for automatic investment management on in the field of personal finance recorded on discs; computer software for automatic investment management in the field of personal finance that may be downloaded from a global computer networkACTIVEJul 18, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 15, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 15, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 9, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Sep 21, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance