USPTO serial 75592610
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT D. BRING
ROBERT D BRING254 S MAIN ST5TH FLNEW CITY, NY 10956| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LUGGAGE OF ALL TYPES; BACKPACKS; TOTES; SPORTSBAGS; PERSONAL ITEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | NOVELTY ITEMS; ; FLATWARE, GLASSWARE, DISHES; CROCKERY | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 024 | FLAGS, BANNERS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | WEARING APPAREL | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 028 | TOYS; SPORTING EQUIPMENT | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 029 | FOOD | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 032 | BEVERAGES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |