Drawing for B

USPTO serial 75592734

B

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY R. MANSFIELD

ANTHONY R MANSFIELD SEWARD & KISSELONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Design used by parent company and subsidiaries providing a spectrum of services including-- trust and other financial services, including investment advisory services, provided to high net worth individuals; strategic financial services; tax services; family office servicesACTIVENov 10, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance