Drawing for HARPER'S WEEKLY

USPTO serial 75592771

HARPER'S WEEKLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARPER'S WEEKLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRETT N DORNY

BRETT N DORNY MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY ET AL1 FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed materials reproducing previously published articles, newspapers, and magazines in the field of news coverageACTIVEMar 12, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 11, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 11, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance