USPTO serial 75592865
ELITE MODELS FASHION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3149033Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELITE MODELS FASHION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1700 Fribourg, CH
1700 FRIBOURG, CH
1700 FRIBOURG, CH
1700 FRIBOURG, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Garvey
Michael W. Garvey PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, coats, jackets,[ parkas, peajackets, lumber jackets, bomber jackets,] T-shirts, shirts, vests, sweaters, skirts, pullovers, dresses, robes, suits, trousers, jogging trousers, jeans, undergarments, dressing gowns, brassieres, shorts, swim wear, [kimonos,] and socks; footwear; and headgear, namely, caps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 17, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GROUPE ELITE SA
- Other trademarks owned by ELITE LICENSING COMPANY, SA
- Other trademarks owned by ELITE LICENSING COMPANY, SA
- Other trademarks owned by ELITE LICENSING COMPANY, SA
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ELITE MODELS FASHION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |