USPTO serial 75592866
COUNTERPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COUNTERPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT MASON, MASON & ALBRIGHT2306 S EADS STP O BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | home theater electronics, namely stereo amplifiers, tuners, and receivers | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |