USPTO serial 75592902
PAYMENT PORTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELTSCH, KEITH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAYMENT PORTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. PETER HOCHBERG
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 E 6TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH A GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK FOR A CONSUMER TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE OF THE FINANCIAL ACCOUNT OF THE CONSUMER FROM ANY DEVICE CONNECTED TO THE GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK, TO STORE INFORMATION ABOUT PRIOR FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS IN AN ELECTRONIC WALLET CONTROLLED AND OPERATED BY A SERVICE PROVIDER ON ANY DEVICE CONNECTED TO THE GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK, TO RECEIVE THE PURCHASE ACTIVITY OF THE CONSUMER ACTIVELY ON-LINE AND IN REAL TIME FROM ANY DEVICE CONNECTED TO THE GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK, AND TO SELECT AND PAY FOR ELECTRONIC PURCHASES MADE ON ANY DEVICE CONNECTED TO THE GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |