USPTO serial 75592940
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Olmsted, OH
North Olmsted, OH
North Olmsted, OH
NORTH OLMSTED, OH
FORTUNE BRANDS WATER INNOVATIONS LLC
NORTH OLMSTED, OH
Other trademarks owned by FORTUNE BRANDS WATER INNOVATIONS LLC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tara A. Kastelic
Tara A. Kastelic CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP1405 East Sixth StreetThe Calfee BuildingCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1607| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Robe hooks of common metals ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ faucets for use in kitchens, lavatories, and roman tubs; ] tub spouts [ ; shower and tub control valves; ] [ tub wastes and overflow drains; bidets; ] shower heads; [ hand-held showers and slide bars therefor; shower grab bars; and shower accessory holders ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ Bath accessories, namely, towel bars; towel rings; [ toothbrush holders; ] toilet tissue holders; [ soap dishes; and cup holders; ] excluding cleaning cloths, particularly window cleaning and dish cloths made of natural or synthetic products, leather or chamois; window cleaning cloths made from fabrics of unspun and unwoven binder-impregnated fibers; floor mops; window boxes made wholly or principally of plastics materials, for garden and/or horticultural use, cleaning cloths and cleaning sponges for washing and wiping made of textile, sponge material, plastics, leather and artificial leather, hand-operated scouring pads for removing dust made from plastics or metal, spare parts for hand-operated floor cleaning devices, namely, materials made of plastics, as single parts to be assembled to hand-operated floor cleaning devices, such as brooms, brushes, mops and scrubbing brushes, brooms and brushes, protecting gloves for household and kitchen use, namely, disposable gloves, latex gloves, and dusting gloves; kitchen gadgets, namely, pot and pan scrapers, but excluding knives and forks; rolling pins, spatulas, turners, whisks; utensils for ironing purposes, excluding irons themselves, namely, fitted covers for ironing boards, ironing boards, fitted covers for irons, pads for ironing boards ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |