USPTO serial 75592957
POLETECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLETECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lincolnshire, NG31 6SF, GB
Lincolnshire, NG31 6SF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER T FROST
ROGER T FROST JONES & ASKEW LLP191 PEACHTREE ST NE 37TH FLATLANTA, GA 30303-1769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Pavement and sidewalk signs, posts, poles, pipes, sockets, sleeves, and boxes all made of metal; metal reinforcing rods for concrete; metal cases and surrounds containing polyurethane collars; metal enclosures to fit around street lights and traffic lights; and metal posts to fit into the ground | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic pavement and sidewalk signs, posts, poles and parts therefor; non-metallic enclosures for electrical connections and polyurethane collars to fit into sockets in the ground which receive support posts, traffic lights, and street lights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POLETECH SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by POLETECH SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named POLETECH
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |